Georges River Council · 2 April 2026
The panel unanimously granted development consent for DA2025/0247 for use as a place of public worship at Unit 1, 47-49 Planthurst Road, Carlton, subject to council’s recommended conditions as amended.
Residents and nearby businesses may see a new approved worship use in the industrial complex, with the panel noting compatibility with the site context, parking, circulation and separation from residential land.
Georges River Council · 2 April 2026
The panel unanimously supported a Clause 4.6 variation to the Height of Building development standard under the Georges River Local Environmental Plan 2021 for 58A Algernon Street, Oatley.
This allows the proposed development to proceed despite a height variation, with the panel finding the variation justified and not expected to cause unreasonable environmental or amenity impacts, subject to conditions.
Georges River Council · 2 April 2026
The panel unanimously granted development consent for DA2025/0456 for alterations and additions to the existing parking structure associated with the heritage-listed dwelling at 9 Stuart Crescent, Blakehurst, subject to recommended conditions amended to include an additional condition 12(a).
This affects a heritage-listed residential property and confirms the works can proceed under conditions set through the planning process.
Georges River Council · 5 March 2026
The Panel supported submission of the Planning Proposal for the Affordable Housing Contribution Scheme to Council for endorsement and commended the initiative. It suggested the submission should better explain how the scheme operates when Council collects funds rather than acquires property.
This could affect future affordable housing policy and how developer contributions are used in the Georges River area.
Georges River Council · 5 March 2026
The Panel refused DA2025/0397 for demolition works and construction and use of a restaurant at 143 Stoney Creek Road, Beverly Hills. Reasons included inadequate vehicular access, impacts on trees, an acoustic report not meeting relevant standards, and unacceptable neighbourhood amenity impacts including noise and lighting associated with proposed operating hours.
Residents near the site will not see the proposed restaurant proceed in its current form, with the refusal citing traffic, tree protection and amenity concerns.