MinutesRadar

Make it local

Pick your council

We’ll open that council page so the local view has its own URL.

street · 1 meetings

Illawarra Street, Allawah

1 decisions1 topicsUpdated 7 May 2026

Mentions

  • Mentioned in relation to shadow impacts not fully shown in submitted diagrams.
  • Allawah residents and nearby neighbours are affected because a proposed seven-storey co-living and boarding house was refused on planning, documentation and public-interest grounds.
  • Residents should be aware that court proceedings may still influence final outcomes for these developments.
  • Three major development proposals in Carlton, Allawah and Kogarah were unanimously refused.

Decisions

Refusal of DA2025/0567 at 5 Mona Street, Allawah

The Panel unanimously refused Development Application DA2025/0567 for demolition works and construction of a seven storey co-living and boarding house at 5 Mona Street, Allawah. Reasons cited in the extract include failure to meet minimum lot size requirements under the State Environmental Planning Policy (Housing) 2021, insufficient information addressing WaterNSW and NSW Police responses, inadequate shadow diagrams, and a finding that the development was not in the public interest. The Panel noted the matter is before the Land and Environment Court.

Allawah residents and nearby neighbours are affected because a proposed seven-storey co-living and boarding house was refused on planning, documentation and public-interest grounds.

Topics

Multiple planning matters already before the Land and Environment Court

The Panel expressly noted that the Carlton, Allawah and Kogarah applications were currently before the Land and Environment Court for determination.

Residents should be aware that court proceedings may still influence final outcomes for these developments.

Meetings

Local Planning Panel - 7 May 2026

The Georges River Local Planning Panel considered four development applications, unanimously refusing three co-living or major development proposals before the Land and Environment Court and indicating one Oatley proposal was supported despite some view-loss concerns.