street · 2 meetings
Brook Street
Mentions
- Street location for the approved Coogee application.
- Nearby heritage context referenced in the refusal reasons for 94 Dolphin Street.
- A development was approved in South Coogee, which may affect local streetscape, amenity and construction activity.
- This Coogee development was approved, which may influence local housing and neighbourhood impacts.
- Blocks a larger apartment proposal that could have affected neighbourhood character, privacy, amenity and nearby heritage context.
- Shows active community participation on developments that may affect local streets and amenity.
Decisions
28 Gregory Street, South Coogee (DA/175/2026)
The Panel visited the site, considered written submissions and the assessment report, and supported the application subject to the development consent conditions in the assessment report. Carried unanimously.
A development was approved in South Coogee, which may affect local streetscape, amenity and construction activity.
2/105 Brook Street, Coogee (DA/349/2026)
The Panel visited the site and reviewed the assessment report, then supported the application. Carried unanimously.
This Coogee development was approved, which may influence local housing and neighbourhood impacts.
DA/65/2026 refused – 94 Dolphin Street, Coogee
The Panel refused consent for demolition, tree removal and a five-storey residential flat building with seven apartments and basement parking, citing conflict with zoning objectives, excessive height and floor space, heritage impacts, deep soil shortfalls and inadequate variation requests.
Blocks a larger apartment proposal that could have affected neighbourhood character, privacy, amenity and nearby heritage context.
Topics
Public deputations on planning proposals
Objectors and a supporter addressed the Panel on the Coogee and Randwick applications before the meeting moved into closed deliberations.
Shows active community participation on developments that may affect local streets and amenity.
Planning compliance concerns
The refusal for 94 Dolphin Street was based on multiple non-compliances, including height, floor space ratio, heritage compatibility, deep soil and DCP controls.
Indicates the Panel is enforcing local planning standards where proposals are considered too large or out of character.