MinutesRadar

Make it local

Pick your council

We’ll open that council page so the local view has its own URL.

street address · 1 meetings

171 Arden Street

2 decisions1 topicsUpdated 14 May 2026

Mentions

  • Site of the refused co-living review application.
  • Allows a new dwelling development in Maroubra, with implications for local amenity, streetscape, parking and construction impacts.
  • Blocks a co-living proposal in Coogee, preserving local planning controls and addressing resident concerns about amenity and safety.
  • Reinforces local resistance to development types seen as out of step with planning policy and neighbourhood expectations.
  • The refused Coogee proposal will not proceed as lodged, reducing immediate concerns about amenity and safety impacts at 171 Arden Street.

Decisions

34 Mermaid Avenue, Maroubra - development consent granted

The panel accepted the applicant’s written request to vary the height of buildings development standard in Randwick LEP 2012, finding compliance was unreasonable and unnecessary and that sufficient environmental planning grounds existed. Consent was granted for demolition and construction of a 3-storey dwelling house with basement parking, storage, plant rooms, foyer, swimming pool within the front setback, excavation and associated works, subject to conditions.

Allows a new dwelling development in Maroubra, with implications for local amenity, streetscape, parking and construction impacts.

171 Arden Street, Coogee - review application refused

The panel refused the application, citing unresolved amenity and safety concerns and concern that the proposal would set an undesirable precedent for inappropriate co-living development inconsistent with planning policies.

Blocks a co-living proposal in Coogee, preserving local planning controls and addressing resident concerns about amenity and safety.

Topics

Co-living precedent rejected at Coogee site

The refusal at 171 Arden Street was based partly on the view that the proposal could establish an undesirable precedent for non-compliant co-living development.

Reinforces local resistance to development types seen as out of step with planning policy and neighbourhood expectations.

Meetings